Slot Substrate Assessment

Where the leverage lives.
v0.4.1 snapshot 2026-04-29 49,998 LEO objects
Lorenz curve of cumulative |L_signed| against cumulative mass for the LEO catalog. 0 20 40 60 80 100 cumulative mass (%) 0 20 40 60 80 100 cumulative |L_signed| (%) proportional reference Top-100: 1.5% mass → 42.2% |L| 28× leverage concentration
Cumulative |Lsigned| as a function of cumulative mass across the 49,998-object LEO catalog. Eight real cutoffs computed from compiler/data/leverage_map_v2_full_results.csv at SHA 47f32fd6…. The 45° dashed line is what mass-proportional leverage would look like — the curve’s departure from it is the substrate’s discrimination.

Methodology

(1) Lsigned(a) = ρ(a) · σmag(a) per-object substrate leverage (2)PσLEO = Σa Lsigned(a)  /  Σa ρ(a) catalog-level Kessler-saddle observable (3) Δ⟨Pσ⟩(S) = ⟨Pσ⟩(CS) − ⟨Pσ⟩(C) closed-form intervention algebra over any subset S

The 28× concentration ratio is unpriced tail risk in every covariance matrix that assumes kinematic-distance independence. Per-asset Pc screening treats spatially distant satellites as failing independently. The substrate measures the topological coupling that assumption misses.

Definitions: ρ is per-object density on the momentum-aware conjunction graph; σmag is the character-graded coupling magnitude inherited from the rank-4 V4 carrier of the prime hyper-radix; Lsigned is their product. Equation (3) is closed-form arithmetic over the leverage map — no Monte Carlo, no propagator, no statistical sampling, reproducible bit-for-bit against the snapshot SHA.

What you receive

Deliverable: an audit JSON pinned to the snapshot SHA, plus a rendered PDF. Same form as the public artifacts in the audit charter.

Selected data points

Rank cutoff Cum. mass Cum. |L| Concentration ratio
top-1 0.01% 2.22% 356×
top-10 0.06% 14.30% 247×
top-100 1.50% 42.16% 28×
top-1,000 15.40% 65.52% 4.26×
top-5,000 47.20% 89.52% 1.90×
top-10,000 65.93% 96.07% 1.46×
top-25,000 84.51% 99.44% 1.18×
top-49,998 100.00% 100.00% 1.00×

Top-10 highest-|L| objects (named)

# Name COSPAR Class inc° mass (kg) Lsigned
1 KH-8 (05171) 1971-033A Payload 110.9 2,973 33,384
2 KH-8 (04492) 1970-061A Payload 111.0 2,973 27,617
3 KH-8 (04874) 1971-005A Payload 110.9 2,973 24,869
4 KH-8 (03984) 1969-050A Payload 110.0 2,973 24,405
5 Firefly Alpha second stage 2023-202B Rocket Body 140.0 909 20,739
6 KH-8 (03665) 1969-007A Payload 106.2 2,973 18,950
7 KH-8 8 (Gambit-3 8 - OPS 4941) 1967-090A Payload 106.1 3,650 18,469
8 KH-8 (03335) 1968-064A Payload 110.0 2,973 16,468
9 KH-8 (06837) 1973-068A Payload 110.5 2,973 16,341
10 KH-7 35 (Gambit-1 35 - OPS 1890) 1966-109A Payload 104.6 2,190 13,536

Retrograde inclination (>90°) and low perigee dominate the upper leverage tail. KH-8 reconnaissance assets carry the highest-|L| signatures in the public catalog because their orbit class intersects prograde traffic at every node crossing.

Engagements are direct. Email with the asset, fleet, or jurisdiction you want assessed and a sample lands in your inbox within one day.

Engage by email →
tony@fancyland.net